Keeping the poll options hidden until you cast your vote ensures that your decision is based solely on your own opinion and not influenced by the choices of others. This fosters a fair and unbiased voting environment, encouraging genuine responses and accurate results. For this reason it’s not logic to let the vote after seeing the results.

The essence of voting is to make an unbiased choice. But if a user sees the preliminary results, wouldn't it affect their independence and possibly lead them to be swayed by the influence of society?

For instance, there's an experiment in voter behavior called the "bandwagon effect," where people tend to do something primarily because others are doing it.

As a conclusion, I would suggest making this feature optional when creating polls)

The offline feature is interesting, but what about making it available to anyone connecting to the same wifi? In the case of the example you provided, in a plane, if one creates a hotspot (even without data) on a flight, maybe Telegram would detect devices with the Telegram app that are connected to the wifi so that many peiple join, making it easy to create a group chat with your fellow travelers.

The live chat could also benefit a bot's integration (along with moderation commands), making it easy to put music or to share content in the live stream.

Jesus