Impeachment witness Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman says Trump is a 'useful idiot' for Putin and wants to 'please' him

• Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a retired US Army officer and key impeachment witness, told The Atlantic that President Donald Trump was a "useful idiot" for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
• "They may or may not have dirt on him, but they don't have to use it," Vindman said. "They have more effective and less risky ways to employ him."
• He said Trump "has aspirations to be the kind of leader that Putin is, and so he admires him," adding: "He likes authoritarian strongmen who act with impunity, without checks and balances. So he'll try to please Putin."
• Trump fired Vindman from the National Security Council in February after Vindman testified in impeachment hearings. Vindman eventually left the military altogether following what he characterized as a "campaign of bullying, intimidation and retaliation by President Trump and his allies."
• Vindman is not the first national-security official to suggest Trump may be compromised by the Russians. Dan Coats, the former director of national intelligence, reportedly held a "secret belief" that Putin had something on Trump.
• Former US spies also expressed similar sentiments to Insider last year after the G7 summit, where Trump forcefully advocated Russia's readmittance to the alliance.
• Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a former Army officer and key impeachment witness, characterized President Donald Trump as a "useful idiot" eager to please Russian President Vladimir Putin in an interview with The Atlantic published Monday.

Trump "should be considered to be a useful idiot and a fellow traveler, which makes him an unwitting agent of Putin," Vindman told The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg.

"They may or may not have dirt on him, but they don't have to use it," he continued. "They have more effective and less risky ways to employ him. He has aspirations to be the kind of leader that Putin is, and so he admires him. He likes authoritarian strongmen who act with impunity, without checks and balances. So he'll try to please Putin."

Vindman told the outlet that Trump was what the Army calls "free chicken," something that just comes to you without requiring any extra work.

Vindman served as the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council and had firsthand knowledge of Trump's infamous phone call in which he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to launch investigations targeting his political rival Joe Biden while Trump held up vital security assistance and a White House meeting.

Testifying in the House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry into Trump last year, Vindman described Trump's actions as "inappropriate" and "improper."

After Trump was acquitted by the Republican-controlled Senate, he fired Vindman and his twin brother, Yevgeny, who had no involvement in the impeachment proceedings, from the National Security Council.

Vindman left the military altogether following what he characterized in a Washington Post op-ed article as "a campaign of bullying, intimidation and retaliation by President Trump and his allies" that "forever limited the progression of my military career."

Vindman is not the first national-security official to question whether the president is an unwitting Russian asset.

Dan Coats, the former director of national intelligence, harbored a "secret belief, one that had grown rather than lessened, although unsupported by intelligence proof, that Putin had something on Trump," the journalist Bob Woodward wrote in his new book, "Rage," an early copy of which was obtained by Insider.

"Coats could see no other explanation" for the president's behavior, Woodward wrote.

Current and former US spies also expressed similar sentiments to Insider last year after the G7 summit, where Trump advocated for Russia to be allowed back into the alliance.

Glenn Carle, a former CIA covert operative and frequent Trump critic, told Insider that for years there had been "no question" in his mind that the president was behaving like "a spy for the Russians."

"The evidence is so overwhelming that in my 35 years in intelligence, I have never seen anything so certain," Carle said. "Trump clearly responds favorably to praise. And over the years, the handling officer — Putin, in this case — realizes what the asset wants, and that's what they provide. Trump wants to be told he's the greatest, so that's what you tell him, over and over again, until he comes to believe that is the motivation for his actions."

Trump's "intent and odd personal fascination with President Putin is worth serious scrutiny," John Sipher, a former CIA clandestine operative who spent 28 years at the agency, told Insider. "We have enough evidence that his actions and comments are wildly at odds with both our allies, and the professionals in his own administration. For the president to go against intelligence analysis and the counsel of scores of experienced professionals suggests there is something else animating him.

"Until the time that the president bothers to articulate his own policies and views," he said, "I have no choice but to believe that he is in some way compromised."

The former FBI agent Peter Strzok echoed that in his new book, "Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald Trump." Strzok also told NBC's "Meet the Press" over the weekend that Trump's financial interests in Moscow had put him in a position "where the Russians have leverage over him and are able to influence his actions."