You can test this entry and submit issues during the testing period of the TON Trustless Bridge Challenge contest.
Entries with serious issues will not be able to win the contest, but even minor issues might be important for overall results.
Info
Testing and Issues
Voting
by rating
Issues
First of all, a great work! Learned from it.
Some notes. Not the major ones, but anyway.
Uses additional `callback` param in lite-client's `check_block` message to simplify transaction-checker. Not sure if it's allowed or not.
`verify_block_signatures` doesn't check if the same signature is used multiple times. So in theory it is possible to achieve any required total weight having only one valid signature.
Transaction-checker silently accepts all bounced messages, so if associated lite-client failed to verify block, excesses will be accumulated on transaction-checker smc.
Some notes. Not the major ones, but anyway.
Uses additional `callback` param in lite-client's `check_block` message to simplify transaction-checker. Not sure if it's allowed or not.
`verify_block_signatures` doesn't check if the same signature is used multiple times. So in theory it is possible to achieve any required total weight having only one valid signature.
Transaction-checker silently accepts all bounced messages, so if associated lite-client failed to verify block, excesses will be accumulated on transaction-checker smc.
Nobody added any issues yet...